Modern communication tools have become essential for how UK companies work. Hybrid and remote setups are now standard across British businesses, so choosing between Microsoft Teams and Slack carries real weight. The decision affects daily productivity, compliance needs, cost control, and how well your systems scale in the years ahead.
This guide compares the two platforms across what matters most to decision-makers. We examine messaging, meetings, integrations with other software, data security, and the full cost picture. Rather than just listing features, we show how each option performs in practical business situations and different technology environments.
While Teams and Slack compete directly, they serve fundamentally different purposes. Teams forms part of the Microsoft 365 family, creating an all-in-one workspace. Recognising these different approaches helps businesses pick the right tool for their current operations and future growth.
Teams vs Slack at a Glance
| Feature Area | Microsoft Teams | Slack |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Approach | Integrated collaboration platform within Microsoft 365 | Chat-focused communication platform |
| Messaging | Connected to meetings, calendar and shared documents | Channel-based messaging with threaded replies |
| Video Meetings | Built-in meetings, webinars and recording | Basic native calls, advanced features via integrations |
| File Management | SharePoint and OneDrive integration with version control | File sharing within chats, plan-based storage limits |
| Integrations | Strong Microsoft ecosystem integration plus third-party apps | Extensive third-party app marketplace |
| Automation | Structured workflows through Power Automate | Flexible automation via Workflow Builder |
| Security | Enterprise-grade compliance and centralised admin governance | Strong security with enterprise plan options |
| Overall Strength | Cohesive, scalable solution for structured organisations | Flexible platform suited to integration-heavy teams |
Upgrade Your Business Calling
Core Differences Between Teams and Slack
The main distinction in Teams versus Slack comes down to ecosystem fit against straightforward messaging.
Slack started life as a focused chat tool to cut down on email clutter. It organises work through channels, ties in smoothly with various apps, and supports adaptable processes. This setup works especially well where teams juggle lots of different SaaS services that must link up quickly.
Microsoft Teams sits within the broader Microsoft 365 suite. It combines messaging, video calls, file sharing, and document editing all in one place. Businesses already running Outlook, SharePoint, or OneDrive find it creates a seamless, all-in-one workspace.
In everyday use:
Slack performs well due to its flexibility and broad third-party integrations.
Teams provides a unified experience within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Recognising this distinction provides a clearer foundation for comparison.
Teams vs Slack: Interface and User Experience
How easily people can use a platform often decides if it sticks. Even top tools falter when staff struggle to find their way around.
Slack features a streamlined, chat-focused interface. Channels sit neatly arranged, threads keep discussions tidy, and moving about feels natural. Smaller or technically confident teams often prefer its minimal interface and short learning curve.
Microsoft Teams takes a more organised path. It splits chats, team spaces, calls, and files into clear zones. If your firm already knows Microsoft apps, it all flows logically. Newcomers might find it a touch busier at first compared to Slack.
Choosing between Slack and Teams on user experience often ties to your team’s makeup. Agile smaller groups lean towards Slack’s ease, while bigger setups favour Teams’ clear structure.
Teams vs Slack: Messaging and Collaboration
Both platforms handle messaging well, but they approach it in distinct ways that suit different needs.
Slack focuses on ongoing chat flows. You can set up channels by team, project, or subject, with threads keeping replies organised and out of the way. Quick reactions cut down on extra messages, direct chats run smoothly, and Slack Connect lets you work easily with outside contacts.
Microsoft Teams offers channel chats too, but it goes further by linking straight into document work. Staff can edit Word, Excel, or PowerPoint files right there in the app, side by side. This proves handy in offices where shared documents form a big part of the daily routine.
Experience Seamless Collaboration
Teams vs Slack: Video Meetings and Calling
Video conferencing is now a core business requirement.
Teams comes with full video meetings think easy scheduling, recording, live captions, and webinar options. Linked to Outlook, it keeps call setup simple and in one spot.
Slack supports voice and video calling, though advanced features often require integrations. While this provides flexibility, it may introduce additional costs or platform complexity.
Firms after a single-tool setup without extras tend to pick Teams for meetings.
Teams vs Slack: Integrations and Workflow Automation
Teams integrates most effectively within the Microsoft ecosystem. Power Automate boosts what it can do, especially with SharePoint or Planner.
Slack’s app store gets high marks. It joins CRM, project boards, and dev apps smoothly. Workflow Builder sets simple automations, no tech degree needed.
Organisations using a wide range of SaaS tools may find Slack integrates more flexibly. Microsoft core? Teams integrates seamlessly.
Teams vs Slack: File Sharing, Search, and Storage
Microsoft Teams links files to SharePoint and OneDrive for proper organisation. You get structured folders, version history to track changes, and real-time editing by multiple people. Companies already using Microsoft 365 enjoy seamless access across apps without switching tools.
Slack makes it simple to upload files right into chats, keeping everything in context. Its search works smoothly to find old messages or documents fast. Storage limits tie to your plan, so teams needing more space often upgrade for long-term archiving.
In bigger operations, Teams offers stronger file management overall. Slack works better for groups who want quick sharing without much setup.
Teams vs Slack: Security and Admin Controls
Security and compliance top the list when picking between Slack and Teams, especially in regulated fields.
Microsoft Teams taps into Microsoft’s robust enterprise security system. Key features cover advanced threat detection, rules to stop data leaks, and certifications for major standards. Admins control user access and data retention from a central dashboard.
Slack brings solid security too, with single sign-on, encryption at enterprise level, and tools for access management. The Enterprise Grid plan gives large firms structured oversight across workspaces.
Teams vs Slack: Security for Regulated Industries
In fields like finance, healthcare, and legal work, security and compliance come first. Communication platforms must hit tough standards and give full oversight of company data.
Microsoft Teams works inside Microsoft’s proven business security system. It includes data leak protection, multi-step logins, and one-place admin controls. With Teams Phone added, calls, chats, and meetings all stay under that same secure setup, which simplifies staying compliant.
Slack offers good security and encryption too. That said, firms with heavy rules might face more steps or add-ons to reach the same level as Microsoft’s full compliance tools.
For businesses needing strict control and easy audits, Teams usually delivers a cleaner, more reliable option.
Pros and Cons of Slack vs Microsoft Teams
Both platforms help teams work together well, but each suits different business setups and sizes best.
Microsoft Teams – Key Strengths & Limitations
- Brings chat, meetings, calendars, and document editing into one complete workspace.
- Works seamlessly with Microsoft 365 apps like Outlook, SharePoint, and OneDrive.
- Includes video calls, webinars, and recording – no need for extra software.
- Provides strong security, admin tools, and compliance for larger companies.
- Handles growth easily across big teams and departments.
- Layout might overwhelm complete beginners.
- Without good planning, channels can get messy and hard to manage.
- Includes lots of features small teams often won’t use.
Slack – Key Strengths & Limitations
- Simple, chat-centred design that’s quick to learn.
- Threaded replies keep conversations clear and organised.
- Huge choice of app connections via its marketplace.
- Easy to set up and start using right away.
- Larger meetings usually need add-ons like Zoom.
- Basic plans limit file storage and access to old messages.
- Needs separate tools for full document editing or compliance.
- Can feel disjointed as your company expands.
For businesses with clear structures especially those using Microsoft 365 Teams often works better by keeping communication, meetings, and files all in one place.
Teams vs Slack: Pricing Comparison
Microsoft Teams usually comes bundled in Microsoft 365 plans. For companies already paying for those services, Teams adds value without much extra cost.
Slack starts with a free plan that covers basics but caps message history. Paid tiers open up more features, extra storage, and support as you grow. Enterprise costs adjust based on your business size and needs.
If Microsoft 365 forms your core setup, Teams delivers better value overall. For teams running a mix of non-Microsoft tools, Slack’s standalone pricing often feels more straightforward and adaptable.
Understand Teams Costs
Which Platform Should You Choose?
- Your choice between Teams and Slack hinges on your business setup and future plans.
- Small startups and nimble teams often pick Slack for its quick flexibility and wide tool connections.
- Mid-sized firms decide based on their current software stack.
- Larger companies usually gain more from Teams’ strong controls and compliance features.
- If you already use Microsoft 365, Teams slots in effortlessly with daily workflows.
- Operational requirements should take priority over feature comparisons.
FAQ's
1. Why do many organisations choose Microsoft Teams over Slack?
Many businesses go with Microsoft Teams as it slots neatly into Microsoft 365. Teams can handle chat, meetings, calendars and documents all in the same spot no need to flip between apps all day.
2. Is Microsoft Teams more cost-effective than Slack?
Companies on Microsoft 365 already get Teams in the package. This usually costs less than getting Slack separately and adding meeting tools on top.
3. Does Microsoft Teams offer stronger document collaboration ?
Teams work for more varied business needs. Video calls sit alongside chats, files, and daily workflows all in the same space. It manages meetings capably while handling regular teamwork, which Zoom’s meeting-only approach or Google Meet’s simpler build don’t match.
4. Is Microsoft Teams better for larger or regulated organisations?
Teams aligns well with large enterprises and highly regulated industries. It uses Microsoft’s security and compliance setup for easy central control of policies and access.
5. Does Microsoft Teams support hybrid and remote working effectively?
Yes it does. Built-in video meetings, recordings, live captions, and calendar integration support hybrid and remote teams effectively – best if you use Outlook and Microsoft 365.
Final Thoughts
When choosing between Teams and Slack, let your practical needs lead the way, not passing trends. Weigh your current tech stack, security setup, and team habits before committing. Teams may offer greater value for organisations already embedded in Microsoft 365. Testing both platforms can help clarify which solution better aligns with operational workflows and long-term strategy. Slack remains highly effective for organisations prioritising flexibility across diverse software environments.
Keep Everyone Connected
